Abstract
Green methanol is emerging as a promising route to decarbonize the commercial marine industry. However, methanol is not a drop-in fuel in the compression ignition engines that dominate the marine industry because it is difficult to ignite due to its low cetane number and high latent heat of vaporization. The most straight-forward way to use methanol in the compression ignition engines is to premix the methanol, such as with port fuel injection during the intake stroke, and igniting the methanol with a diesel pilot injection. Because diesel fuel is still used in this strategy, it does not fully displace the petroleum diesel fuel. To completely displace the petroleum-derived diesel fuel, this investigation presents experimental results comparing diesel and biodiesel pilot ignition in a dual-fuel strategy with methanol in a marine-variant of a Cat® C18 18 L engine with a 145 mm bore. Engine performance and emissions characteristics are presented that include effects of diesel vs. biodiesel across a series of fuel injection timing and other operating parameters, including intake manifold pressure and engine load. Results presented include in-cylinder pressure and combustion-related findings about heat release, methanol fuel energy substitution rates greater than 75% from 1 to 18 bar BMEP on a single cylinder engine at 1800 RPM. Criteria pollutants including particulate matter, NOx (NO and NO2), unburned fuel, and formaldehyde, as well as the overall BSFC and FSN of the combustion process relative to the baseline diesel operation.
